901 Strada Vecchia Update: May 9th Pretrial Hearing — Mohamed Hadid may be nearing guilty plea
For many in our community who follow the Mohamed Hadid's 901 Strada Vecchia criminal proceedings, here are updated news articles of interest. Re-printed below is the initial April 20, 2017 article from THE BEVERLY HILLS COURIER and additional links to the UK-based DAILY MAIL article, and THE REAL DEAL real estate publication.
Hadid Could Be Nearing Guilty Plea On 901 Strada Vecchia By Matt Lopez - April 20, 2017
Mohamed Hadid could be nearing a guilty plea in the criminal trial over the 901 Strada Vecchia megamansion he developed in Bel Air. Thursday morning in Van Nuys Superior Court, attorneys for both Hadid and the L.A. City Attorney’s office met in private for close to an hour. After emerging from the meeting, Hadid’s attorneys indicated that their client was nearing a guilty plea, with a few more conditions to still be worked out. It is believed that Hadid would seek conditions saying that in exchange for a guilty plea, sentencing would be delayed for a yet-to-be-decided period of time, within which he can bring the property into compliance with Los Angeles building code. In that scenario, if Hadid does bring it into compliance within that time frame, the criminal conviction would be erased. If not, he would then face sentencing. Hadid’s attorney Robert Shapiro argued Thursday in open court that sentencing would need to be delayed because of concerns that, with a criminal conviction on his record, Hadid would be unable to secure a construction loan to bring the property into compliance.
Don Cocek of the L.A. City Attorney’s office said Thursday that there were no federal regulations prohibiting anyone with a criminal conviction from receiving a loan. It is unknown what Hadid’s punishment would be if convicted. L.A. City Attorney Deputy Chief Tina Hess said Thursday that Hadid would not be facing jail time. It’s possible that Hadid could be looking at a mix of a fine and public service, along with a possible ban on building in Los Angeles for a period of time. The nearly 30,000-squarefoot property ran afoul of residents and L.A. city officials back when it was under development in 2014. In 2015, LADBS inspectors cracked down on the property, ruling all unapproved construction, which they said included features like retaining walls, concrete decks and an underground theater, were to be removed. Since then, the case has been toiling in the court system. Victor De la Cruz, attorney for Joe Horacek, a resident who lives directly below the massive home, fired off a letter this week to L.A. building officials, noting that any future work done on the project “will require the issuance of discretionary entitlements and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review prior to proceeding.” De la Cruz also called for the project to be declared a public nuisance and that a remediation plan be required, “in order to rectify the various illegalities that have plagued this project’s development from day one." A follow-up hearing has been scheduled for May 9. The City Attorney did not return a request for comment before Thursday’s deadline.
Click here to link to the BEVERLY HILLS COURIER article.
Click here to link to the UK-based DAILY MAIL article.
Click here to link to THE REAL DEAL article.
Click here to see City of Los Angeles Report on Appeal from LADBS Determination of Superintendent of Building